Includes notes taken by Dalton at the conference.
- ‘Are chemists human?’ Chemistry in Britain, Vol. 11, No.3, March 1975.
- 'Dangerous workplace or dangerous worker?' Nursing. The Add-on Journal of Clinical Nursing, Vol 2, No. 1, May 1982.
- ‘A chemist’s reactions’ Science for People, 60, April 1986.
- Outline of article on factory inspectorate, no date.
- 'Killing off a killer', April 1988.
- ‘Lessons from the United Kingdom: Fightback on Workplace Hazards, 1979-1992’. International Journal of Health Services, Vol. 22, No. 3, 1992.
- ‘Asbestos hazards: past, present and future’ Occupational Health review, September/October 1995.
- 'Homeworking can damage your health', c. 1997.
- Letter from Dalton to the Lancet on the hazards of white asbestos. The Lancet, Vol 352, 1998.
- Flyer for ‘Safety, health and environmental hazards at the workplace’ by A.J.P. Dalton, 1998.
Includes correspondence between Dalton and the editor of the Health and Safety Bulletin about the review.
The letter was written in response to ‘Asbestos Revisited’ by Alleman and Mossman in Scientific American, July 1997. Article included. Also included is letter from Joseph LaDou to Scientific American on the same article.
The letter was written in response to articles in both newspapers on asbestos dumping in the West Midlands. Article included. Also included is related correspondence between Dalton and Nick Tofiluk, Superintendent, West Midlands Police.
Croner commissioned Dalton to write several articles for its Asbestos Risk Management newsletter and its Management of Contract Work newsletter. Included are copies of the following articles by Dalton:
- ‘Asbestos in the environment’
- ‘Focus on asbestos’
- ‘High risk activities’
- ‘Why is 3000 asbestos deaths a year not news?’
- ‘What progress on a global ban on asbestos?’
- ‘The duty to survey buildings for asbestos’
Includes emails to Dalton in response to his letter.
Includes review by David Hodgkinson in Health and Safety at Work.
Includes letter to Dalton from John Hare, of Leigh, Day & Co, solicitors, re Dalton’s letter to the New Scientist.